| 1,838 | 57 | 40 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
利用编制的语言创新思维能力量表进行试测,然后对量表做项目分析,结果显示,量表虽然难度偏大,但有较好的区分度,大部分题目的难度与区分度符合要求。单因素方差分析检验发现:三组被试(初二学生、高一学生、大一学生)逻辑性思维技能的表现没有显著差异,但在创造性思维技能和语言创新思维能力两方面的表现差异显著;在批判性思维技能方面,大一学生与高一学生的表现无明显区别,但均明显优于初二学生。研究表明,要提高量表的信度与效度,需要对其中某些题目进行修订和完善。
Abstract：After a pilot test of the scale for Language Innovative Thinking Ability,the results of the item analysis show that the degree of difficulty is relatively high,but the discrimination index is well above acceptable.Most of the test items are well established in terms of difficulty and discrimination.The results of one-way ANOVA indicates that there are no significant differences among the three groups of participants(Junior Two students,Senior One students and Freshmen) in terms of the scores for logic thinking skills.However,in terms of the scores for creative thinking skills and language thinking skills,the between-group differences among the three are statistically significant.As for the critical thinking skills,there is no significant difference detected between Senior One students and Freshmen,although these two groups significantly perform better than Junior Two students.It is concluded that some items of the instrument need to be revised and perfected so as to be more reliable and valid.
[1]Feist,J.&F.Barron.2003.Predicting creativity from early to late adulthood:Intellect,potential,and personality[J].Journal of Research in Personality,(37):62-88.
[2]Harris,A.2004.Measured intelligence,achievement,openness to experience,and creativity[J].Personality and Individual Difference,(16):913-929.
[3]Kitto,J.&D.Rudowicz.1994.Measuring creative thinking:An activity-based approach[J].Creativity Research Journal,(7):59-69.
[4]Lyster,R.2010,Learning and Teaching Language through Content:A Counterbalanced Approach[M].Amsterdam:John Benjamins Publishing Company.
[5]University of Cambridge.2003.Thinking Skills Assessment[M].University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate.
[6]爱德华·德博诺(Edward De Bono).2009.宗玲译.创新思维训练游戏[M].北京:中信出版社.
[7]谷振诣刘壮虎.2006.批判性思维教程[M].北京:北京大学出版社.
[8]黄远振兰春寿薛常明.2013.英语文学体验阅读的理论依据与研究方法[J].华侨高等教育研究,(1)1-6.
[9]柯安利.2007.中小学英语也要重视文学阅读[N].光明日报,2007-07-18.
[10]李筱菊.1997.语言测试科学与艺术[M].长沙:湖南教育出版社.
[11]刘艳萍文秋芳.2010.国外大学生思维能力研究评析及启示[J].石家庄经济学院学报,(5):133-136.
[12]骆方孟庆茂.2005.中学生创造性思维能力自评测验的编制[J].心理发展与教育,(4):94-98.
[13]王建卿文秋芳.2011.国外思维能力量具评介及启示——我国外语类大学生思维能力现状研究报告[J].江苏技术师范学院学报,(7):38-42.
[14]王哲.2009.创新思维训练500题[M].北京:中国言实出版社.
[15]周耀烈.2009.思维创新与创造力开发[M].浙江:浙江大学出版社.
[16]文秋芳赵彩然.2010.我国外语类大学生思辨能力客观性量具构建的先导研究[J].外语教学,(1):55-58.
基本信息:
中图分类号:H319
引用信息:
[1]兰春寿,黄远振.语言创新思维能力量表的编制与检验[J].语言教育,2014,2(04):8-14.
基金信息:
国家社会科学基金资助研究课题“英语文学体验阅读与语言创新思维研究”(项目编号:11BYY044); 教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目“英语文学阅读思维型教学模式研究”(项目编号:12YJA740035)的阶段性研究成果
2014-11-15
2014-11-15