| 737 | 5 | 157 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
言语行为是语用领域的重要研究课题,本文以SSCI期刊论文为主要语料,采用定量和定性分析相结合的方式,考察国外近10年来言语行为研究的现状。研究发现:第一,言语行为研究的数量呈现不断增长的趋势,但是高频言语行为研究论文的数量有所下降;第二,相关论文主要发表于语用学和语言科学类期刊,社会、文化和教育类期刊的论文数量也较为可观;第三,研究的主题多为语言理论反思和语言元素分析,社会和文化交际方面的研究趋势见长;第四,研究方法多为实证研究,以定量研究为主,定量和定性相结合的研究方式不多。文章认为,可从社会、文化、教育和测量四个方面展开言语行为的深入研究。本研究可为言语行为研究的转型与深化提供一些借鉴。
Abstract：Speech act is the important research subject in pragmatics.This paper investigates the current studies on speech act abroad in the recent decade based on the data from SSCI with both quantitative and qualitative methods.It is found that:first,the number of research papers on speech act is increasing,but that of the high quotation frequency papers is decreasing.Second,most of the papers are published in pragmatic and language science journals,as well as social,cultural and educational journals.Third,the research mainly concerns with linguistic theory and language elements.However,studies on social and cultural exchange also present an increasing trend.Forth,most of the researches are based on an empirical study with quantitative study as the major research method,while the combination of both quantitative and qualitative is still needed.It is believed that further study on speech act should be developed from aspects of society,culture,education and measurement.The paper throws some light to the transition and deepening of speech act study.
[1]Bachman,F.1990.Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press.
[2]Harris,S.2006.The pragmatics of political apologies[J].Discourse&Society,(6):716-734.
[3]Huang,Y.2009.Prangmatics[M],Beijing:Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
[4]Levinson,S.2010.Pragmatics[M].Beijing:Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
[5]Marion,W.2009.Modal particles explained How modal particles creep into translations and reveal translators'styles[J].Traget-international Journal of Translation Studies,(1):74-97.
[6]Martin,M.&S.Burgess.2004.The rhetorical management of academic criticism in research article abstracts[J],Text,(2):171-195.
[7]McGeveran,W.2008.Rethinking Trademark Fair Use[J].Iowa Law Review,(1):49-124.
[8]Muller.F.&A.Simion.2010.Exploring theory of mind after severe traumatic brain injury[J].Cortex,(46):1088-1099
[9]Nugyen,T.2012.The relative effects of explicit and implicit forn-focused instruction on the development of L2 pragmatic competence[J].Journal of Pragmatics,(22):416~434.
[10]Nureddeen,F.2008.Cross cultural pragmatics:Apology strategies in Sudanese Arabic[J].Journal of Pragmatics,(40):279-306.
[11]Sigrun,B-L.2007.Students writing emails to faculty:An examination of e-politeness among native and non-native speakers of English[J].Language Learning&Technology,(11):59-81.
[12]Taguchi,N.2008.Cognition,language contact,and the development of pragmatic comprehension in a Study-Abroad context[J].Language Learning,(1):33-71.
[13]Thomas,J.2010.Meaning in Interaction:An Introduction to Pragmatics[M].Beijing:Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
[14]Walters,S.2009.A conversation-informed test of L2 Aural pragmatic comprehension[J],TESOL Quarterly,(1):29-54.
[15]Wilson,D.2006.The pragmatics of verbal irony:echo or pretence[J].Lingua,(116):1722-1743.
[16]Yu,M-C.2005.Sociolinguistic competence in the complimenting act of native Chinese and American English speakers:A mirror of cultural value[J].Language and Speech,(1):91-119.
[17]陈新仁.2013.语用身份:动态选择与话语建构[J].外语研究,(4):27—32.
[18]卢加伟.2013.认知框架下的课堂语用教学对学习者二语语用能力发展的作用[J].解放军外国语学院学报,(1):67—70.
[19]李捷.2011.语用学十二讲[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社.
[20]冉永平.2005.当代语用学的发展趋势[J].现代外语,(4):403—412.
[21]冉永平.2013.多元语境下英语研究的语用关注[J].外语教学与研究,(5):669—678.
[22]冉永平.2007.语用学传统议题的深入研究新兴议题的不断拓展——第十届国际语用学研讨会述评[J].外语教学,(6):6—10.
[23]孙莉.2014.语用学研究中的定性分析法探究[J].外语教学理论与实践,(2):9-14.
[24]王立非李琳.2013.我国商务英语研究十年现状分析(2()02—2011)[J].外语界,(4):2—10.
[25]文兵.2014.言语行为认定模式研究[J].外语教学,(6):40—44.
[26]文秋芳.2004.应用语言学研究方法与论文写作[J].北京:外语教学与研究出版社.
[27]邹申.2014.民族志研究方法在语言测试研究中的应用[J].外语电化教学,(9):3—9.
基本信息:
中图分类号:H030
引用信息:
[1]杨昆,时闻.国外近十年言语行为研究现状分析(2004-2013)[J].语言教育,2016,4(03):44-49.
2016-08-15
2016-08-15